Agricultural Development of Farmers based on the Physical Accessibility in South Sumatra Wetlands

Authors

  • M. Edi Armanto Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya Universty, South Sumatra
  • Elisa Wildayana Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya Universty, South Sumatra
  • Agus Hermawan Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya Universty, South Sumatra
  • M.S. Imanudin Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya Universty, South Sumatra
  • A.N. Triana Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya Universty, South Sumatra
  • Sukardi Sukardi Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya Universty, South Sumatra
  • A. Sundoko Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya Universty, South Sumatra
  • A. Mutaqin Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya Universty, South Sumatra
  • E.F. Lestari Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya Universty, South Sumatra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35334/iciksa.v0i0.55

Abstract

Banyuasin district is mentioned as rice center (food barn) in South Sumatera Province. Areas with great potential are given opportunities to develop by providing assistance in supporting infrastructure development, with the hope that the potential can be utilized to the maximum extent possible to assist the implementation of regional development. The research purposed to analyze the impacts of physical accessibility on rural development and to analyze agricultural development of farmers based on the physical accessibility in South Sumatra wetlands. This research is an experimental research using Split Plot Design with two factors, first factor (F) which determines Main Plot is rice farming system that includes ricefields and traditional system. The second factor (R) called Sub plot is the location of Sub-district that reflects the accessibility level (very high, high, medium and low), namely Tanjung Lago; Talang Kelapa; Muara Telang; and Makarti Jaya. The results concluded that rural characteristics are dominantly influenced by physical accessibility, the better the physical accessibility is built, and the rural characters will increasingly benefit farmers as long as the government can manage the physical accessibility for the benefit of farmers. If physical accessibility is more emphases for the interests of urban communities, thus physical accessibility existence cannot support the welfare of farmers in villages. Livelihood sources of farmers are increasingly diverse as the physical accessibility of rural areas could be improved, especially to support life of farmers. Helping farmers taking advantages of increasing levels of physical accessibility can be accelerated by developing a rural employment opportunity; building local initiatives; and re-thinking local extension systems.

References

Armanto ME 2019 Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 50(2): 653-661.

Armanto ME 2019 Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(5); 184-192.

Guth M, Stępień S, Smędzik-Ambroży K and Matuszczak A 2022 Journal of Rural Studies. 89: 235-247.

Mcguire R, Longo A and Sherry E 2022 Journal of Rural Studies. 89: 161-170.

Wildayana E and Armanto ME 2018a Agriekonomika Journal 7(1); 30-36.

Wildayana E and Armanto ME 2018b Journal of Sustainable Development. 11(2); 52-62. [7] Wildayana E and Armanto ME 2018c Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 24(2), 180-188.

Wildayana E and Armanto ME 2019 Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 20(1); 100-107.

Wildayana E and Armanto ME 2021 Habitat, 32(1), 1–10.

Zhang L, Song J, Hua X, Li X, Ma D and Ding M 2022 Journal of Rural Studies. 89: 199-207.[11] Wang F, Wang M and Yuan S 2021 Land. 10(11), 1141.

Gao J, Cai Y, Liu Y, Wen Q, Marcouiller DW and Chen J 2022 Journal of Rural Studies. 89: 73-81.

Groenewegen PP, Kroneman M and Spreeuwenberg P 2021 BMC Health Serv Res 21(107); 1-10.

Shao R, Derudder B and Witlox F 2022 Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 2022, 102753.

Hao P and He S 2022 Journal of Rural Studies. 89: 66-72.

Ishak SM, Aman Z and Taib HM 2020 International Journal of Modern Trends in Social Sciences. 3(14), 129-148. [17] Räisänen J and Tuovinen T 2020 Journal of Rural Studies. 73, 56–67.

Moritz J, Tuomisto HL and Ryynänen T 2022 Journal of Rural Studies. 89: 54-65.

Sulak B and Türk E 2022 Journal of Rural Studies. 89: 35-44.

Fauzia G, Alamsyah Z, Yanita M, Napitupulu D, Ernawati HD and Elwamendri 2021 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 782 032063.

Vilas-Boas J, Klerkx L and Lie R 2022 Journal of Rural Studies. 89: 171-185.

Holidi, Putranto DDA, Armanto ME and Halim PKS 2018 Ecology, Environment And Conservation, 24 (1); 223-227.

Le Goff U, Sander A, Lagana MH, Barjolle D, Phillips S and Six J 2022 Journal of Rural Studies. 89: 1-12.

Suab SA and Avtar R 2020 In: Avtar R, Watanabe T. (Eds) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Applications in Agriculture and Environment. Pages 101-118. Springer, Cham.

Khiabani HP and Takeuchi W 2020 In: Avtar R, Watanabe T. (Eds) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Applications in Agriculture and Environment. Pages 71-84. Springer, Cham.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-28

Issue

Section

Articles