ANALYSIS MODEL AND STRATEGY FOR HANDLING BANANA PRODUCTION RISKS IN CENTRAL SEBATIK BORDER AREA

Banyuriatiga Banyuriatiga, Etty Wahyuni MS, Nove Kurniati Sari

Abstract


Sebatik Tengah is one of the sub-districts with the lowest production when compared to other sub-districts, namely only 0.004% of the total production of the entire Nunukan Regency. The cause of low production in this region is because farmers are faced with various production risks such as pest and disease attacks, weather, uncertain harvest times, price risks and human errors. For this reason, this study aims to analyze the risk level of kepok banana production, and recommend alternative strategies that can be done to minimize the risk. Respondents in this study were 30 farmers who were determined through the census sampling method. The data used in this study are primary data obtained from survey results and direct interviews with respondents and secondary data obtained from the literature and agencies related to research. To answer the first objective, the data analysis used is risk analysis by calculating the standard deviation and variance while the second objective is analyzed using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). The results showed that the highest average production risk level in the first period was 893.67 kg, the highest variance in the second period was 41,739 kg, the highest standard deviation in the second period was 204.30 kg, the highest coefficient was in the second period of 0.24 kg with the lowest production lower limit in the second period of 454.33 kg. The highest coefficient price risk level in the third period is Rp.0.08 with the lowest lower limit in the third period of Rp.1,342.05. Sources of risk that have the highest to lowest Risk Score Value (RSV), namely the highest value found in pests and diseases of 59.43, the second highest selling price decreased by 53.66, weather by 46.13, demand decreased by 43.60, harvest time 38.83, and the lowest there is human errors of 14.88. Based on the results of the Failure Mode And Effect Analysis (FMEA) there are preventive and mitigation strategies. For prevention, namely monkey pests are handled by clearing the land, harvest time by increasing the search for information, human resource errors by maintaining the land. As for mitigation, namely caterpillars and ladybugs are handled by mechanical, chemical and cultural techniques, fusarium wilt and leaf spot are handled by cleaning damaged leaves and burning them, for the price risk the handling is by means of a contract system and setting cropping patterns.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Nunukan. Kabupaten Nunukan Dalam Angka 2022. Nunukan; 2022.

Aslan A, Madiong B, Almusawir A. Pembentukan Daerah Otonom Pulau Sebatik Dalam Persfektif Keadilan. Paradig Adm Negara. 2021;3(2):138–43.

Hermanto YB, Purba LP, Nugroho M. Usaha Pelestarian Hutan Dengan Pengadaan Bibit Pohon Pisang Untuk Ditanam Di Lereng Gunung Arjuno. he Cent Sustain Dev Stud J. 2022;1(1):1–8.

Darma FE. Analisis Risiko Produksi Pada Sistem Agribisnis Usahatani Pisang Kepok (Musa Paradisiaca L.) Di Kecamatan Sebatik Tengah Kabupaten Nunukan. Universitas Borneo Tarakan; 2019.

Fajriadi L, Deli A, Jakfar F. Analisis Risiko Produksi dan Harga Tandan Buah Segar kelapa Sawit. J Ilm Mhs Pertan. 2019;4(1):274–87.

Fanani A, Anggraeni L, Syaukat Y. Pengaruh kemitraan terhadap risiko usaha tani tembakau di Kabupaten Bojonegoro Provinsi Jawa Timur. J Manaj Agribisnis. 2015;12(3):194–203.

Heriani N, Zakaria WA, Soelaiman A. Analisis keuntungan dan risiko usahatani tomat di Kecamatan Sumberejo Kabupaten Tanggamus. J Ilmu Ilmu Agribisnis J Agribus Sci. 2013;1(2):169–73.

Laksana Y, Adriantantri E, Sumanto S. Upaya Mengurangi Cacat Produk Keripik Pisang Dengan Metode Statistical Quality Control (SQC) Dan Failure Mode And Effect Analysis (FMEA)(Studi Kasus UMKM Indochips Alesha Trimulya). J Valtech. 2022;5(2):142–51.

Rizqi AW, Jufriyanto M. Manajemen Risiko Rantai Pasok Ikan Bandeng Kelompok Tani Tambak Bungkak dengan Integrasi Metode Analytic Network Process (ANP) dan Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). J Sist Tek Ind. 2020;22(2):88–107.

Atmajaya D, Gustopo D, Adriantantri E. Rekomendasi implementasi manajemen risiko supply chain keripik pisang menggunakan metode house of risk (HOR)(studi kasus: Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah (UMKM) Indochips Alesha Trimulya). J Valtech. 2020;3(1):22–9.

Aliah NU, Sulistyowati L, Muhibbudin A. Hubungan ketebalan lapisan epidermis daun terhadap serangan jamur (Mycosphaerella musicola) penyebab penyakit bercak daun sigatoka pada sepuluh kultivar pisang. J HPT (Hama Penyakit Tumbuhan). 2015;3(1):35–43.

Naftaliasari T, Abidin Z, Kalsum U. Analisis Risiko Usahatani Kedelai Di Kecamatan Raman Utara Kabupaten Lampung Timur. J Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis. 2015;3(2):148–56.

Indra Gumay Febryano, F Safe’i R, Irwan Sukri Banuwa I.

Performapengelolaan Agroforestri Di Wilayah Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Lindung Rajabasa. J Hutan Trop. 2017;5(2):127–33.

Widodo WD, Suketi K, Rahardjo R. Evaluasi kematangan pascapanen pisang Barangan untuk menentukan waktu panen terbaik berdasarkan akumulasi satuan panas. Bul Agrohorti. 2019;7(2):162–71.

Setiawan S, Maimunah M, Suswati S. Keragaman parasitoid erionota thrax l. Pada dua Jenis tanaman pisang bermikoriza di kabupaten deli serdang. J Ilm Pertan. 2019;1(1):37–44.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35334/iciksa.v0i0.174

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Organised by:

Jurnal J-Pen Borneo:Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian

Faculty of Agriculture, University Of Borneo Tarakan

Tarakan city, North Borneo Province, Indonesia